Russell Twyce

“I personally feel that I am protected by law.”  A person said to me in a discussion

“But you are deceived by your learned perception of law’s function.” I answer.  If you can push the propagandized training aside and examine inner working of the system of law with straight logic, a different version emerges. The ‘supposed’ intent of the rule of law is to protect, but the system of law does NOT actually do that. Law protects only itself from being broken – it is against the law to break a law.

Instead of protecting you, (which the law doesn’t do but which ‘deterrence’ does), the rule of law law has set you up as a target for people who want to break laws. The rule of law makes it possible to ‘lash-out’ at society as a whole by breaking any law, even when it hurts only one person.  It’s logical to surmise that ‘some’ crime would not occur if a law was not there for a malcontent to strike out at (and an innocent person would not be harmed in that instance just because someone hated the government).

And the ‘deterrence’ that ACTUALLY does the protecting could easily be accomplished with a system other than law. And Police could function and courts could work using a different rationale than the asinine theory that a person’s wrongful action has caused damage to a theoretical item. And as a result the crime level would have dropped by the amount that the crimes were previously being committed just to spite the authority, and the deterrence previously meted out by the rule of law, would still be in effect through the non-rule-of-law justice system (based on protecting human rights and safety, instead of on an imaginary rule-of-law king’s theoretical power to issue edicts).

Whether you like it or not, the rule-of-law is dead.  It simply doesn’t know that its head has been removed.  As a society, we really need to start discussing the logical replacement for the dark ages system of law, that really should have died a hundred years ago.

I’m personally manifesting for the rule-of-law to fall.