Russell Twyce

Normal is FAR from sanity

And Accepting Bad Government is INSANE

For this article I’m using ‘not delusional’ as the definition for ‘sane’. I suppose I should provide a definition for ‘delusional’ too. For this post, delusion means something that only seems or appears to be real.

What is reality? Touch yourself. You have physical form – you are real. The physical world is easy – it is real. Concepts are more difficult because they only really exist in the mind. What you perceive of the physical world is also real. Look at yourself in a mirror. Your eyes see yourself as existing and your mind interprets your own being as real – and it is. But let’s tackle a slightly more difficult concept.

Look at the flag flying at your local courthouse. Your eyes detect a colorful tablecloth fluttering at the top of a big metal stick but your mind then attaches a number of concepts to it. You automatically interpret the symbol as representing the nation or the state but that is a trained response – the flag is just a garishly colored cloth attached to a pole. Equating a nation with a flag is not intrinsically rational. But for society to function, some concepts have to be accepted as quasi-real or a condition of chaos might exist. So let’s examine that.

The flag is flying at the courthouse. Is law a delusion that must be deemed as sanity? Absolutely NOT! Law is the WORST delusion that is currently defrauding our troubled world. For one thing, law is FAR to warped and subject to misinterpretation. The twisted logic one’s mind needs to boggle through to arrive at law and bad government is utterly insane. Let’s break it down.

1. The mind has to deem the non-existent nation represented by a flag, as having legitimate authority to pass judgments and enact punishments against people.

2. The supposed authority is a function of another dubious concept called ‘the social contract’ where people relinquish their natural born freedom in return for protection. But this ‘social contract’ isn’t an actually existing document either. It is just a theory postulated during the mid 1700′s. And frankly, it is garbage because law does not ACTUALLY protect people. (See the next item for further explanation of this non-protection concept). Even if a social contract did exist, the government and law are in breach of it, so it should be null and void.

3. Supposedly a court is deciding on an appropriate response to an action that one person performed against another, but the illogical concept of law presumes instead that a theoretical manifestation of the law itself was hurt/broken/damaged. Instead of protecting the people as promised in this highly touted social contract claims, in fact the obtuse rule of law only protects itself from having it’s laws fractured and it also preserves a bad government’s ability to illegitimately withhold our natural freedom.

So here is my point. If you are a ‘law abiding’ citizen, then you are insane because you are believing in some delusional, and patently untrue concepts. Interestingly, one definition of ‘abiding’ is ‘putting up with something bad’. The insane rule-of-law concept certainly does qualify as heinously BAD! I though, am quite sane, or if you suppose that ‘normal’ is sane then I am hyper-sane because I know that law does NOT exist. Neither does the ‘social contract’ that our bad governments use to squash our freedom. I do NOT abide with law and neither should anyone.

I wish that you were sane like me. Then we could overturn the bad governments of today and return sanity to the world. We will all be much better off when that happens.