Russell Twyce

Imagine it strongly enough and this wonderful world will be true

People are finally free. You suppose that you are free now but you’re not.  You are considered ‘owned’ by your nation – it does NOT have to be that way.  The law treats you as a slave: you must obey it or be punished – that does NOT have to be the case either: there is a better way.  [private_Chevron]People can and will be free someday – hopefully soon.  Serfdom to the concept of nationhood could and should end.[/private_Chevron]

A public administration ACTUALLY represented the voters. Again you might be under the misconception of your elected representative representing you, but their first obligation is to the party sponsors.  And when there is a conflict between your best interest and the party sponsor’s wants, guess who loses out.  It does NOT have to be this way.  [private_Chevron]An independent candidate could represent you, and with political patronage being made illegal, the voters would be fully represented.[/private_Chevron]

The police weren’t grossly over violent. You may erroneously believe that police are more violent due to increasing tension in society but in fact, the police are in a large measure the reason why tension is increasing.  Police are overly aggressive towards people because they are tasked with protecting the law and they view the citizens as the enemy – it does NOT have to be this way.  [private_Chevron]In a wonderful world where public justice is based on protecting human rights/security/safety instead of on preserving a government’s power to be tyrannical, the police and people would both be on the same side.[/private_Chevron]

Greedy corporations weren’t flushing our environment into the sewer and our planetary resources into the landfill sites.  Greed merchants and warmongers are party sponsors and as such, they enjoy the primary service from elected officials.  They also own the mass media, so you’re never told of the real picture.  [private_Chevron]In a wonderful world where the public administration represents people first, both the ecological and the economic problems would simply vanish – unless we leave retaking control of our own lives and our wonderful world until it is too late.[/private_Chevron]

Imagine this wonderful new world. Visualize it as clearly as you can and discuss some wonderful world concepts with me and with with people you know.  When enough of us can see the better future in our mind’s eye, then it will come to fabulous fruition.

A Golden Free Future Awaits – After You Wake Up!

People have called me everything from an anarchist to the anti-Christ.  I don’t care if my position is not understood yet, I’ll continue to state it as loudly and clearly as I’m able to.  I have every right to hold the opinions that I strongly do.

The Authority has NO Authority to be the Authority!

[private_Chevron]I personally do NOT recognize the Government of Canada’s legitimacy as the government of Canada. You might suppose you are free and living in a Democracy, but I state emphatically that you are NEITHER.  The law treats you as if you are owned as a serf and a party dictatorship is NOT democratic.  The ‘Rule-of-Law’ has NO logical right to rule and law is also a very BAD ruler.  Law is guilty of abetting most crime and actually causing some crime.  Changing to a human-rights based system of justice would immediately reduce crime by the amount that law encourages crime – that is probably a 25-50% instant decrease.

Try to think beyond your social programming in favor of law, to see it in its actual fact.  You are enslaved to law.  Law deems itself to have the right to tell you what to do, and to punish you as its slave when you are disobedient.  But examine where the rule-of-law derives the ‘right’ to treat you as a serf – it doesn’t have it – period.  If each citizen as individuals do not posses the ‘right’ to enact laws for others, then the government does NOT have the ‘right’ either, because zero times however many millions, still equals zero.

A human rights based justice system could operate as effectively as law does but without all the many MANY problems inherent and unavoidable with the utterly F*CKED and incorrect theory of law.  And by being based on actual human rights, an alternate justice system WOULD ACTUALLY have the right to operate, as law most certainly does NOT.  But this different criminal justice system would require your waking up and thinking clearly.

No, a Party Dictatorship is NOT a Democratic System

A party system of supposed Democracy only does one thing.  It enables a tiny minority to fabricate a false claim of its commanding a majority.  The sideline problem with a party system of government is that it facilitates and actually encourages political corruption.  The American founding founders were dead set against the party system but had to adopt it when some unscrupulous people banded together into a party. And the rest is a long history of abuse and corruption.  Big money interests don’t need to bribe 50% of a legislature, as they would in a Democracy.  With a party system, only the party leaders need to receive pay-offs.

Do you feel represented by your elected representative?  You shouldn’t because if your elected rep is a member of a political party, then he or she isn’t able to speak their own mind – much less yours.  The party member is basically a sock-puppet for the party leader.  Nazi Party, Fascist Party, Communist Party, Republican Party and Concervative Party.  What is the common theme here?  A party system is no party for real people.  So why don’t we wake up, call the horseshit for what it is, and move on to a bright future of real democracy?

Have I offended you?  Maybe you should comprehend before you decry.

I know that people become incensed when I say that law and the current government are horseshit.  But were you to actually understand my alternate vision, you would see that it DOES make good logical sense and that it points the way to a much better future than the polluted, global-warmed police state where we are currently on a collision course with.  I know that we need police, courts and public administrations what we DON’T need is laws, governments and unrestricted power in the hands of corrupt warmongers.

More and more people are coming to see politics and law as I do.  When enough do understand, then the government and the rule-of-law WILL fall (and good riddance).  Don’t you suppose its a good idea to explore the other available options – before it’s too late?

[/private_Chevron]

No Possible Validation Short Story by Russell Twyce

“This is something we have to do.”  The police chief spoke into a microphone at a press conference.  “We’re required to maintain order and keep the peace.”  Whether he had anything else to say suddenly became moot as a windowpane shattered from being hit with a bullet.  The slug’s trajectory was essentially unaffected and it struck the police chief in the left temple.  He was dead before he and the podium he was gripping collapsed off the stage.

Another hole was punctuated in the window and a scream followed the shot by an instant: the police officer that had employed the taser weapon on the ten-year-old girl dropped off his chair with a shattered spine.  And bedlam ensued as people dived for cover, in a panic.   But no further shots were fired.

“Over the span of less than five seconds,” a newscaster said in a disgusted voice, “one fine police chief was dead and an officer was consigned to a wheelchair.  They were engaged in doing a brave and often thankless job.  It was a cowardly sniper—”.  He didn’t finish his sentence because a 22-caliber bullet fired from studio rafters broke his teeth and devastated his jaw’s right hinge.

“What a day!”  Jen the station’s young weather-girl commented to herself as she crossed the darkened parking lot.  She might’ve felt a bit nervous after a deadly day but there were some police vehicles idling in the lot, as the forensic team was still busy inside the studio.

“Poor Bob.”  She muttered about the newscaster that would be drinking soup through a wired shut mouth.  But she didn’t feel much sentiment: the guy was a conceited jerk and she wouldn’t miss him.

Jen keyed her car’s door lock and slipped into the driver’s seat.  And from behind, a pungent cloth doused in chloroform was clamped over her face.

“You will not be harmed in any way.”  A male voice said in a calm tone.

Jen had just awakened to find that she was bound and blindfolded.  The restraints did not feel like ropes.  Instead she had been tied with torn strips of a soft sheet.  The weather girl could tell that she was still clothed, so the prospect of an immanent rape didn’t seem likely.

“Who are you?”  Jen mumbled over a tongue that felt dry and cottony from the knockout drug he had employed on her.

“I’m the cowardly sniper.”  He spoke softly and in an ironic voice, while he busied himself with her bonds.  The mysterious gunman freed her hands and then took off the girl’s blindfold.  “I’ve brought you here so that you could interview me.”

“I’m not in the news department.”  Jen protested.  She saw that she was seated at a table, on which there was a steno-pad, pencils and a thankfully, a pitcher of water.  She quickly poured a tumbler full.

“And neither are the administrative staff that would’ve first received a statement sent by post.”  The kidnapper was wearing a mask.  It was not a Halloween type or an improvised thug’s mask.  Rather, he was elegantly attired for a masquerade ball.  “Yet I suspect you took enough journalism courses to conduct a proper interview.”

“Why did you choose me?”

“Because as the weather girl,” he chuckled as he spoke, “you’re the only on-air person at that station that has not lied to me—or the other viewers.  You report the weather as you know it, or as you believe it.  Sometimes you’re wrong, but you don’t deliberately deceive, as all other reporters and anchor persons do.”

“Why did you do it?”  Jen bluntly shot out the first question that came to mind.

“I did what many people wish they could do.”  The masked sniper turned the chair opposite the interviewer and sat with his arms folded on the chair’s back.  “An event like the police using a taser on a child offends the moral fiber of most people.  It shows that the police are NOT protecting us.  They are just brutal thugs tasked with keeping ordinary folk under the corrupt thumb of a criminal government.  The cop that actually used the weapon on the ten-year old girl doesn’t deserve to be walking around armed, and now he will be in a wheelchair.”

“The police chief didn’t do it.”

“He merited much worse for defending the action.  There is no possible validation for a policeman’s using a high-voltage stun gun against a child.  The police chief’s defense of an out-of-control officer’s heinous action was in fact, a commendation for the cop’s action.  He was stating that in traumatizing with brute force, anyone that had the gumption to refuse a policeman’s command – even and especially a child’s, that the officer was performing his real function is subduing any future thoughts of resistance to the authority – with grossly overly heavy-hands.”

“So you dealt him death.”  Jen inquired as she scribbled notes on her pad.  “That seems to be as heavy-handed as the officer’s assault on the girl.”

“I interpreted the chief’s words as a statement of eagerness to the political higher ups.  He was saying that he was ruthless enough to step into a role in the criminal political organization.  So I terminated his political career, instead of just giving him a painful wound for his part in the atrocity.”

“You speak of this ‘criminal government’ but this is a democracy: politicians are elected into office by vote.”

“No they’re not.  A party determines who will be on a ballot.  When is the last time you felt you actually had a choice between anything but ‘bad’ or ‘worse’.  I expect your true answer would be ‘never’, but the fear of police brutality and/or social ostracizing is ingrained as deeply in your psyche, as it is in everyone else’s.”

“And you visualize yourself as the only one that will point at the Emperors clothes?”

“Precisely.”  The masked sniper stood.  “And I’m well armed and equipped for that.”

“So the police in this area should be warned.”

“Not just in this jurisdiction.  I happened to be handy to this event, but I’m willing and able to travel to wherever out-of-control police need to be reprimanded.”

“Who are you?”  The girl paused in her writing to look appraisingly at him.  The seemingly young man appeared to be in exceptional physical shape.

[private_Chevron]“It doesn’t matter who I am.  The only thing that counts is that I’m here and that I plan on loudly speaking the quiet public’s true mind, when it needs to be spoken.”

“I don’t think the news editor will air this material, or that the authorities will let him.”  Jen said.  “If anything, you’ll be branded as a dangerous psychopath.”

“Then attach this quote.”  The sniper replied in a sincere tone.  “I have infinite patience and an amazing ability to penetrate any security.  If my views are not presented, I will express my displeasure in a suitably painful or even fatal way.”

“A threat with power behind it can be as effective as an assassination.”  Jen commented as she transcribed his exact words.

“It’s especially useful against those who have their noses deeply in the gravy train.  They don’t want to risk loosing the excesses that they enjoy.”[/private_Chevron]

The End

The above short story is fiction but it is obviously inspired by the true event that recently happened in the American Ozarks, where a police officer used a taser weapon on a ten-year old girl because she was being ‘unruly’ and refusing to take a shower.  This type of police brutality initially offends us, but then people complacently forget about it.  Yet the police are totally out-of-control and incidents like taser use on a child, or tasering to death an unarmed man in Vancouver Canada, are just the highly visible tip of a huge iceberg of senseless police brutality in propping up criminal governments.

We people need to take a clear look at how our society is ordered, or these type of officially condoned crimes against humanity will get worse and more frequent, as we descend further into a police state.  Crime and terrorism is growing because the law enables it to flourish, while the police concentrate only on oppressing people and raising government revenue with tickets.  By only turning a blind eye, you are committing a crime against the future of humanity.

Do you remember Reaganomics?

Or I suppose for the younger audience, I should say, ‘do you remember learning about Reaganomics?’  An unusual theory was presented and then proved – ‘Government revenue could be INCREASED, by LOWERING the tax’.  It seemed strange to many people but it worked.  Now think about the guy who first thought of the idea.  Imagine how he must have had to bash his head against many walls before a few saw what he was talking about.  That is where I am now.

I know how to end terrorism, how to eliminate the spectacular and seemingly pointless mass killings like Columbine, Virginia Tech & Fort Hood, and simultaneously reduce the actual crime rate across the whole spectrum of everyday robberies, rapes, & murders.   And the solution is both simple and painless!  [private_Chevron]In fact, the cure would benefit society in countless ways, it would even solve things like ‘schoolyard bullying’.  It is as easy as Reaganomics was: it just takes a slightly different way of looking at how/why we manage our society.  Courts, police & jails would still operate but even better than they do now.[/private_Chevron]  This might sound Utopian, but like Reaganomics was, it is just logical.

[private_Chevron]The terrorist’s real intended target is the government.  The mass-murder’s real intended target is society as a whole.  Both the terrorist and the mass-murderer are able to strike their targets by hitting ordinary people BECAUSE the law is the direct linkage between government/society and the everyday people.  The mechanism of law, is that the government theoretically takes each crime onto itself.  According to courts, a murderer is really on trial for breaking, or acting against, the government’s law prohibiting murder.

By simply changing the enabling theory of why courts / police / jails are authorized to operate, we could erase the path that links the government to the people.  The government continues to exist and do what it does now (although some terms like ‘governance’ would have to be slightly redefined to fit a new reality.)  But the population target that is currently under the terrorist’s and the mass-murder’s cross-hairs would be effectively removed from the scope’s view.

Law = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Aims gun at a law] –> [Bullet hits people] –> [Political and /or Anti-Social Agenda IS Satisfied]

Non-Law Justice = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Nothing Here to shoot at] –> [Nobody Dies] –> [Political/Society Agenda IS NOT Satisfied]

Or

Non-Law Justice = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Shoots Person or Persons] –> [We try and jail for killing a person or persons and depriving them of their right to life] –> [No Political/Societal Satisfaction]

When a Politically or Socially motivated killer is unable to satisfy political or social agenda by killing people, then he or she will probably NOT kill at all – and terrorism is eradicated with just the stroke of a pen!

I think it is long passed time that we people evaluated at our political reality anyways.  ‘Law’ evolved from the untrue notion that a noble had the right to inflict his word onto the serfs that he owned.  The post magna charta ‘law’ suggests that the law-giver is a concept that is owned by the people, but it still equates to a noble (albiet an elected one) inflicting his word onto the serfs of a different definition.  It need not be this way.  Justice could be rooted on society’s duty to protect human rights, instead of on a noble’s, or a conceptual state entity’s authority – and justice really SHOULD be rooted on human rights.

Almost every existing law statute could be amended to read and function as a non-law.  (And the few that can’t be amended really shouldn’t be used anyways because they obviously DON’T protect human rights).  All of the law apparatus could be easily retooled to non-law with a simple base theory amendment.  And this could be done with absolutely NO DISRUPTION to protective service.[/private_Chevron]

Like Reaganomics, when this revolutionary theory of public justice takes root and is really looked at and understood, it will prove out to be the right solution for the times.

The Real Problem is Law – but only criminals know that I read an interesting post today Catch Me if You Can. The undertone of this post is that people, probably not just the post’s author, are frustrated by the effects of law. On the other hand, they believe that law is working for them and so they support law. But law is not a good system. We are all taught and told to ‘obey the law’. Instead we should all be taught and told not to do things that hurt people – and leave this being obedient to an imaginary slave-master out of it.

Judges, lawyers, politicians and police don’t really understand law, [private_Chevron]law is just the weapon they have to use against the people, in order to get what they want – (too often it is just more money). People don’t actually understand the concept of law either: they believe that law is in place to help them, when in true fact, law simply evolved as a way of extending the rule of nobles.[/private_Chevron]

Criminals DO understand what law is, [private_Chevron]at least they do at a subconscious level, law is a tool that makes it easier for them to commit their crimes. Breaking law is also the solitary motivation in many cases, like at Fort Hood, Virginia Tech and others. The illogical theory of law is also the root cause of why terrorism exists. Yes, law IS illogical and if public justice was actually logical, then it would work as well as you just wish that law could work. Public justice should work largely the way that law works, but it would be much better without law’s bad side effects. Namely, law turns ALL crimes into political statements.

The criminal knows at his action is breaking a thing that belongs to the government and that is often why the criminal is committing the criminal act – at the expense of the innocent victim. In other words, the existence of law has placed a crime target on the victim. Then the court is NOT trying to decide on what one person did to another. Instead, the lawyers are arguing on whether or not a law was damaged (or the imaginary king’s word was disobeyed) when one person harmed another. (Try reading the transcripts of a murder trial – word for word: the dead body is only physical evidence of how the law itself was harmed – which is utter BS).[/private_Chevron]

Criminal Law is another of my posts on this subject. I’ll be writing more soon to show how a different system of public justice could prevent specific crimes and how it would better protect people. And to UniquelyJen, the author of the Catch Me if You Can post, would you care to discuss each of the example cases you cited – to find how they each could have and should have played out.

Reality Shows actually based on REALITY

In the first episode of CSI Cleveland, we’ll meet the cast of misfits who can’t find their ass with both hands and a flashlight. The case they are trying hopelessly to solve is the disappearance of numerous persons from the neighborhood where a known sex offender lives. Unlike the other CSI shows where a fictional investigator can spot a microscopic fragment of glass at the bottom of a swimming pool, CSI Cleveland has officers who have to hold their noses from the stench of decomposing bodies in the yard, but who don’t see anything as amiss.

Imagine a Reality Show based on the Akashic Records!

Maybe if the TV actually aired reality in reality shows and reality simulating drama, the people glued to their TVs might see what reality is really like. Taking a REALISTIC look at who these criminals are and delving realistically into why they commit these heinous criminal acts, could actually do something to prevent criminals from popping up like weeds in a garden, each trying to outdo each other in criminality.

The Akashic Records hold ALL the real reasons

[private_Chevron]How many time do we have to see these types of crimes committed before we actually think about them realistically? A dozen people were just killed at Fort Hood Texas. The ‘official’ version of WHY the gunman opened fire will be the usual official nonsense, just as the ‘official’ version of why the Cleveland Murderer killed will be officious garbage. The REAL problem is with the way the law actually compels killers to kill. But that is to much reality for the TV to actually show.[/private_Chevron]

Click Here to find the key to life in the Afterlife

Another question answered.

“What would be different in your proposed system?”

We would live exactly as we are living today but as free people who are not enslaved by either a government or the law. The needed changes have no detrimental effects and the changeover would be barely noticed. But over the longer term the benefits would be massive.

[private_Chevron]Understand that currently neither the law nor the police have the actual duty of protecting people or their human rights. You only wrongly assume they protect (and yes, some sideline protection does ensue but at a terrible price). Police ‘uphold the law’, which is a warm and fuzzy way of saying that police prop up and inflict a government’s edicts.[/private_Chevron]

Who Else Wants to Make at Least $1000 per Week WITHOUT a Website or a Product of Your Own?

[private_Chevron]The law (please notice the article and noun as if the law actually exists as a thing) is a concept promulgated in the Magna Carta but law never came into being as a physical item. The erroneous premise that a law exists and that it is deemed to have been harmed when a crime is committed is the full reason why the law doesn’t do the job right, and why it is causing more harm than good. That could easily be changed, while keeping most of the individual statutes (like murder, rape, speeding, etc.) fully intact and actionable by police and courts – but with a logically correct ‘right’ to operate. And the court is dealing with the true matter of what one person did to another, instead of arguing speciously over whether this theoretical piece of government inventory received a scratch or a dent while one person was harming another.[/private_Chevron]

I HIGHLY recommend this CLICK BANK PIRATE Program

[private_Chevron]People incorrectly presume that law is the only way to manage a society, largely because they are taught that at home, in schools and by life under a system of law. ‘Law’ uses supposed kingly authority to enforce rules passed by governments and which they treat and we think of as existing objects – Human rights based order derives its authority to maintain public safety and discipline from the actual mandate of protecting human rights. In other words, rights based justice does in truth, what you only think that law does now.

[Note - I'm using the word 'law' only in the context of meaning 'criminal law' and 'traffic law', which are the worst offenders in terms of operating on slavery principles. Tort law, property law, business law and others might be examined sometime in the future but they aren't the greatest cause of our social problems][/private_Chevron]