Russell Twyce

The rule-of-law sucks: people need to rise up and cast off the slave yolk of law. Lawyers would lie and tell to that the alternative to the rule of law is anarchy. BULLSHIT! The alternative to the rule of law is a justice system that is based on protection of people, instead of one having it’s authority based in a government’s power to be a tyrant. Law sucks.

Law sucks.  Law does NOT protect people: it never has and it never will. In fact it is fully the reverse. Law sets people up to be crime targets for anti-political statements. Part of the hidden motivation in ALL crime, is that the act is not against the victim alone, but also against the hated authority of law. It therefore stands to reason that some criminal and/or anti-social behavior would automatically cease if the act did not also make a political statement.  Law sucks.

The rule of law sucks. The rule of law is horse manure spread by lawyers to reap a harvest of money from the seeds of misery that law sows into the victimized population. The rule-of-law is a crime against humanity.  Law sucks.

Normal is FAR from sanity

And Accepting Bad Government is INSANE

For this article I’m using ‘not delusional’ as the definition for ‘sane’. I suppose I should provide a definition for ‘delusional’ too. For this post, delusion means something that only seems or appears to be real.

What is reality? Touch yourself. You have physical form – you are real. The physical world is easy – it is real. Concepts are more difficult because they only really exist in the mind. What you perceive of the physical world is also real. Look at yourself in a mirror. Your eyes see yourself as existing and your mind interprets your own being as real – and it is. But let’s tackle a slightly more difficult concept.

Look at the flag flying at your local courthouse. Your eyes detect a colorful tablecloth fluttering at the top of a big metal stick but your mind then attaches a number of concepts to it. You automatically interpret the symbol as representing the nation or the state but that is a trained response – the flag is just a garishly colored cloth attached to a pole. Equating a nation with a flag is not intrinsically rational. But for society to function, some concepts have to be accepted as quasi-real or a condition of chaos might exist. So let’s examine that.

The flag is flying at the courthouse. Is law a delusion that must be deemed as sanity? Absolutely NOT! Law is the WORST delusion that is currently defrauding our troubled world. For one thing, law is FAR to warped and subject to misinterpretation. The twisted logic one’s mind needs to boggle through to arrive at law and bad government is utterly insane. Let’s break it down.

1. The mind has to deem the non-existent nation represented by a flag, as having legitimate authority to pass judgments and enact punishments against people.

2. The supposed authority is a function of another dubious concept called ‘the social contract’ where people relinquish their natural born freedom in return for protection. But this ‘social contract’ isn’t an actually existing document either. It is just a theory postulated during the mid 1700′s. And frankly, it is garbage because law does not ACTUALLY protect people. (See the next item for further explanation of this non-protection concept). Even if a social contract did exist, the government and law are in breach of it, so it should be null and void.

3. Supposedly a court is deciding on an appropriate response to an action that one person performed against another, but the illogical concept of law presumes instead that a theoretical manifestation of the law itself was hurt/broken/damaged. Instead of protecting the people as promised in this highly touted social contract claims, in fact the obtuse rule of law only protects itself from having it’s laws fractured and it also preserves a bad government’s ability to illegitimately withhold our natural freedom.

So here is my point. If you are a ‘law abiding’ citizen, then you are insane because you are believing in some delusional, and patently untrue concepts. Interestingly, one definition of ‘abiding’ is ‘putting up with something bad’. The insane rule-of-law concept certainly does qualify as heinously BAD! I though, am quite sane, or if you suppose that ‘normal’ is sane then I am hyper-sane because I know that law does NOT exist. Neither does the ‘social contract’ that our bad governments use to squash our freedom. I do NOT abide with law and neither should anyone.

I wish that you were sane like me. Then we could overturn the bad governments of today and return sanity to the world. We will all be much better off when that happens.

Shame on Canadian Customs. I cut short my Asian vacation to return to visit my mother in a palliative care ward but thanks to Customs Canada, at least I will be there in time for the funeral.  I’m missed my connection and am stuck overnight in Calgary because the Canada Customs Nazis searched my bags, computer and tried a batter personal questions that Canadian Customs had NO REASONABLE REASON to.

I ultimately refused to answer the Customs Gestapo’s questions and I bluntly said that Customs Canada did NOT have the right to detain me or to search my possessions.

‘We at Customs Canada have the right to do what we want regardless of your permission.’

‘NO.  You do not have the right and you will NEVER have the right.  What Canadian Customs has is an illegal government’s authority and the armed power to exercise tyranny.   That is not the right.  So are you going to TASER me to death now as is your custom?’

At this point an additional customs Canada guard was sent out to watch, in case I picked up a feather, stapler or similar deadly weapon of mass destruction.

The customs Canada agents ransacked through my computer and my belongings but of course they did not find anything illegal or contraband.  So instead of working on what was evident [nothing], Canada Customs attempted to criminalize me with even more grilling on topics they had no justification for probing into.  But that didn’t bear fruit that Canadian Customs could use to bolster their effectiveness stats with either.

We are almost a decade down the pike from 911 and terrorism is just getting worse.  More and more civil liberties are jack-booted over by the Nazi governments and their brown shirt functionaries.  Few seem to realize (and mass media dares not examine either) that terrorism, sociopathic behavior and many other crimes are exacerbated by and often are actually CAUSED by heavy-handed actions of tyrant government.  Examining the true, logical and realistic reasons for terrorism and action at the actual source can make swift inroads against terrorism and the like, that nearly ten-years of worsening state-sponsored atrocities have only worsened.

For example: there is NO LEGITIMATE JUSTIFICATION for customs agents to be pretend police.  Canada Customs agents should count the heads coming in and keep records.  IF and ONLY IF there is some REASONABLE probable cause for a further inspection, the REAL police might be called in.

But of course my geopolitical opinions are not what a money-greedy and power-ravenous rule-of-law dominating government wants people to hear and consider.  Shame Canada customs.  I’m NOT a pornographer, a gun runner, a smuggler or a terrorist – BUT you precluded my being able to be at my dying mother’s bedside.  Canada Customs is scum!  And Canadians really should gain control of their out-of-touch with reality government.

Human 2.0 – I Say as I Do

The philosophy that Human 1.0 has enshrined is ‘Do as I say’ and that is too often accompanied by the rider ‘not as I do’. The Human 1.0 political and social structure is far too full of both the ‘do as I say’ and the ‘not as I do’. Human 2.0 can easily solve that by acknowledging the problem and taking the steps to fully remedy it.

The entire body of criminal law, tax law and highway law revolves around the ‘do as I say’ principle. Lawmakers presume (erroneously), that they have the authority to tell people what they cannot do and what they must do. Yet the lawmakers and the authority figures suppose that they can do whatever they choose.

Let me give you some examples of ‘do as I say’ and ‘not as I do’.

A president supports laws that forbid using a position of authority to elicit sexual favors then he manipulates a political intern into giving him oral sex in the oval office. ‘Do as I say, not as I do’.

A corporation’s accounting department dutifully reports employee income and remits the money to the government then the CEO fails to pay his fair share by hiding his compensation in stock options and the corporation shirks its obligation by seeking tax concessions and loop holes. ‘Do as I say, not as I do’.

A police car races through a red traffic light with his official flashers on then the officer switches off his lights and wheels into a coffee shop. ‘Do as I say, not as I do’.

Are these enough examples? I could provide countless more. The system is rife with examples because the system provides the opportunities for abuses. So what is the sane solution? What is the easy remedy?

Human 2.0 fixes problems at source. If we can make a system that resists abuses, instead of condoning and facilitating abuses, then the abuses will have to diminish.

Here is a Human 2.0 maxim – ‘A true solution has to fit the real problem’. [private_Chevron]In the case of the ‘do as I say, not as I do syndrome’, the easy fix involves simply eliminating the authority to enforce the ‘do as I say’ portion. Society can operate fine and in actual fact better, without laws. We don’t want a ‘government’: a ‘public administration’ is all really need.

Human 2.0 does NOT mean people are free to rape, murder and steal with impunity! The Human 2.0 public discipline system is simply based on protecting human rights, as opposed to law, which is founded on an unsustainable power to tell people what they must or mustn’t do. That simple change in the core philosophy completely fixes most of the ills in society.[/private_Chevron]

Example Short Story – Taming the Bully by Russell Twyce

Taming The Bully – From Nicholas Flamel’s Humanity Series

A gray-haired man stands beside a podium listening to a speech proclaiming his heroism, In a few minutes, he will be his nation’s highest award. He knows that while he has earned the medal, some merit belongs to someone he has not seen in many years. As the politician drones on, the uniformed man’s thoughts drift back in time.

The year was 1967 and Canada was celebrating 100 years of nationhood. Every classroom in the elementary school was decorated with the stylized maple leaf comprised of twelve triangles that each represent a Canadian province or territory. The one in the grade five classroom though, dwarfed them all: it was a five foot wooden structure and Derwood Covey was fiercely proud of it.

“My Dad is a carpenter.” Derwood bragged to all his classmates. “None of your dads could have made this so good.”

“With a sheet of plywood, a saw, a hammer, nails and a couple 2×4′s,” Nick Burns contradicted, “I could’ve built it myself.”

“Oh yah?” The larger boy asked threateningly. He stepped forward to confront the much slammer new kid in school. “You’re jealous because you don’t have a father.”

“I had one.” Nickolas stood his ground, though the bully was crowding in. “Like everyone did. So I have nothing to be envious about.”

“Your dad was a runt like you.” Derwood pushed the smaller boy, who staggered backwards and bumped into the centenial symbol. The plywood sculpture toppled over its two by four base and the top triangle of the stylized maple leaf breaks. Derwood screamed. “You’ve ruined it!”

“You shoved me.” Nick said. Then he glanced down at the break. “It can be glued back together.”

You’ll fix it: so it is as good as new.” The larger youngster blusterd. “Or I’ll pound you.”

“Had you asked me nicely, I would’ve done just that. But I never bow to threats.”

“You’ll do as I say or you’ll regret it.”

“I do as I say,” the smaller said defiantly, “and I say as I do.”

“Do you have the guts to say that to me outside after school?”

Back in the present moment, the politician is describing the one event that has brought this medal presentation. The policeman had disobeyed his orders and accepted procedure. Instead of just establishing a secure perimeter, he had gone into the crime scene while the senseless mass killings were in progress and stopped the killing.

The man being honored zones out again to resume his meandering through his memories – where the school ground fight has begun.

The larger Derwood has a longer reach and he throws the first punch. His fist glances off Nick’s cheek. It must have hurt but the smaller pugilist is not slowed by the hit and he closes in to grappling range.

Nick Burns absorbs the flurry of fists that strike his shoulders and the back of his head. He grabs the larger boy about the waist, then plants his feet solidly to lift and throw. The larger boy lands on the lawn with the smaller on top.

Derwood Covey has his wind knocked out from the fall. When he recovers his breath, his opponent is straddled on his chest. A hand is poised at his face, with fingers pointed at his eyes and an elbow cocked for a strike. He blinks as the unavoidable blow comes. Then Derwood feels two knuckles tap on his eyelids. It stings a bit and he opens his now watery eyes, only to see the same hand is ready for a repeat strike.

“The next time I won’t bend my fingers.” Nick hisses in a voice so low that none of the fight’s audience can here. “I’ll come in fingernails first, rip out your eyeballs and you’re next pet will be a seeing eye dog.”

“You’ll go to jail for that.” Derwood says.

“I’m a minor so the sentence will be short. But you’ll be blind for the rest of your life.”

[private_Chevron]“What do you want?”

“Yield to my victory and for one week, you’ll do as I say.”

“Okay.” Derwood had looked into the smaller Nick’s eyes and realized that he was deadly serious.

“On behalf of a grateful nation,” the politicians movement towards the policeman has returned his mind to the present moment, “I present this award.”

The ribbon is pinned to his lapel and the ceremony soon concludes.

“You looked bored up there.” The honored man’s wife chuckled when he returned to his seat at the head table.

“I was reliving the day in grade five when this all started.”

“You decided to join the police force when you were in grade five?”

“I decided that when I was in grade three.” The policeman chuckled. “I was in grade five when I learned how to do the job right.”[/private_Chevron]

“After he had beaten me so completely,” Derwood explained to his wife, “I expected Nick to make me do some embarrassing things like carrying his books or something. That’s what I would’ve done to him. He didn’t demand anything and when I inquired why, he just said ‘I say as I do‘.”

“That seems a bit cryptic.” The wife observed.

“Then during that week, I was watching some of my friends tormenting a science geek. One guy was spraying water from a drinking fountain and two others were forcing him to mop it up with the seat of his pants.”

“Knowing you the way I do,” she guessed, “I’ll bet you stepped in.”

“I just watched and laughed like everyone else. Then Nick stepped up behind me and he whispered:[private_Chevron] ‘What if I had demanded that you belittle yourself like that?’ And for the first time in my life, I identified with the victim.”

His recounting the story to his wife sent the policeman’s mind into the past again.

“There are three of them.” Derwood noted.

“There are two of us and if you count him, we are three.” Nick nodded a head toward the science geek. “But I doubt if this situation will take more than just one hero.”

“That’s quite enough of this!” Derwood Covey announced in a loud voice as he stepped in between the victim and the bullies, who were some of his closest friends. Then he pointed a thumb over his shoulder. “If you want at him, you have to come through me.”

“Was there a battle royal in the grade five hall?” Lisa Covey inquired.

“Not that day. But I did have to physically reconcile with those friends later.” He recalled. “That day I just learned what respect looked like.”

“I didn’t know you liked me.” The skinny science geek had gushed when the bullies were gone.

“I don’t like you.” Derwood had replied. “But you have the right to be whoever you are, without being harassed for it. And today I stood up for that.”

“The expression on the geek’s face that day,” the policeman explained to his wife, “was unlike any I had seen before. He didn’t display the fear or hatred that I was used to. His demeanor was of pure respect and I liked it so much that I became a lifelong junkie for it.”

“And that path took you finally to the ultimate act of heroism and selflessness that you were just honored for.” Lisa smiled. “I’ve always seen that in you.”

“It wasn’t there before grade five. Canada’s 100th birthday was year one for me.”

“What happened to Nicholas Burns?” She asked.

“He disappeared shortly after that. They said Nick ran away from his foster home.” Derwood Covey stood up. “Excuse me, I need to use the washroom.”

The honored policeman stood at the sink and looked at his mirrored reflection. His need for the bathroom’s privacy was mostly that he felt that he was coming close to emotional tears and that didn’t fit very well with his image.

[/private_Chevron]“Congratulations.” Said a man from the doorway.

“Nick Burns!” Derwood exclaims after a shock of recognition. Figuring out who spoke had taken extra effort because his apparent age didn’t match. “You look only half as old as you must be.”

“My years have been kind.” Nicholas Flamel lied. “And I’m proud of how you turned out.”

“Who could’ve known that one incident at the tender age of eleven,” Derwood chuckled, “would have such a profound effect on a life.”

“The ramifications have been on many more lives than just yours.” Nick spoke wryly. “I’ve looked in on you from time to time. Your rare brand of policing has been a positive force in more ways than you know.”

“How is it that you were so wise as you were in grade 5?” Derwood asked a question that he had pondered many time over the years. “And how do you manage to appear so young now?”

“Even back then, I was substantially older and more experienced than I looked.” Nick didn’t tell of the truth: which was of his being over 600 years old, back when Derwood was eleven. Nicholas Flamel had reverse aged himself with his philosopher’s stone, in order to affect certain persons while they were at an impressionable age.

“In grade five, I couldn’t have thanked you as deeply as I can now. The change that you brought in me was profound and it made my life wonderful!” The police officer avowed. “In using my strength and authority only to protect, I garnered nothing but respect from people. Most of my fellow police officers have never been able to understand that. I suppose that is because they didn’t learn it young enough, as you helped me to do.”

“The ‘do as I say’ mentality does nothing but harm, even when it is purportedly being used for the purpose of good.” [private_Chevron]

“I gave up on trying to tell guys what the difference between them and I was. They just seemed unable to understand.”

“Society wrongly teaches bullies that the key to respect is wearing a uniform.”

To be continued – Work In Progress[/private_Chevron]

Human 2.0 is a philosophy that WILL sweep the world. Learn more about it at russelltwyce.com.

Any resemblance to persons living or (brain) dead is purely sarcastic and reflective of my staunch belief that the rule-of-law, as it exists today, is nothing short of revived Nazism, with criminal politicians using brown-shirted police to keep the population enslaved to profiteering sponsors.

Short Fiction by Russell Twyce

“Sieg Heil!” The Conservative Nazi Party shouted and they raised their hands in the Nazi salute. The exulted leader had just ascended the podium for his annual state of the police state address.

[private_Chevron]I’m still working on this. I posted this story start as a placeholder.[/private_Chevron]

“I’m also pleased to report,” Adolph Harper continued exuberantly, “that our new concentration camp on Baffin Island has gone into full production exterminating undesirables. The high projected cost of digging mass graves in the permafrost was ingeniously solved by one of our party sponsors. The bodies will be stuffed into depleted oil wells and then cemented over.”

[private_Chevron]Might be continued…but I mostly started this story as a teaser.[/private_Chevron]

Later that evening, Adolph Harper retired to his drawing room. He was wearing his favorite bedroom slippers: they were the fuzzy pink bunny ones with cute little Swastika button noses.

[private_Chevron]The End…For Now[/private_Chevron]

Did you sign any Social Contracts?

I know that I never inked my name on any contract that delimited my personal freedom. I don’t think you ever did either. Are you responsible for the sins of your father? Actually, neither your dad nor your grandfather signed a social contract either. The simple fact is, that this so-called social contract was never ratified and it should never be signed either because the one-sided terms of this illegal (and conceptual only) document are the main cause of societal problems.

Age of Enlightenment? Horse Manure! I call it the age of Serfdom to Sophists.

Thomas Hobbes (1651), John Locke (1689) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762) are the most famous philosophers of contractarianism. Contractarianism? Wow! What a mouthful of crap that word is! This time frame also means that not even my great-great-great-great-great grandfather signed any damned piece of paper that consigns my freedom to a corrupt government’s (money) loving hands. I am NOT bound by this pernicious social contract and neither is anyone else. Period.

“Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”
Slavery is Freedom? That statement would fit nicely into George Orwell’s 1984.

Social Contract means Convoluted Serfdom!

Do you know who the Sophists were? Read about that ancient Greek school of orators and it may give you a vision of the phrase ‘sophisticated society’, that is quite different than you suppose the term means. Our ‘sophisticated’ society has been duped into believing lies are true. And a critical examination of those lies, show the social contract has clauses of fine print that nobody EVER agreed to.

Human 2.0 does NOT recognize the validity of this supposed ‘social contract’.
[private_Chevron]More Soon[/private_Chevron]

Imagine it strongly enough and this wonderful world will be true

People are finally free. You suppose that you are free now but you’re not.  You are considered ‘owned’ by your nation – it does NOT have to be that way.  The law treats you as a slave: you must obey it or be punished – that does NOT have to be the case either: there is a better way.  [private_Chevron]People can and will be free someday – hopefully soon.  Serfdom to the concept of nationhood could and should end.[/private_Chevron]

A public administration ACTUALLY represented the voters. Again you might be under the misconception of your elected representative representing you, but their first obligation is to the party sponsors.  And when there is a conflict between your best interest and the party sponsor’s wants, guess who loses out.  It does NOT have to be this way.  [private_Chevron]An independent candidate could represent you, and with political patronage being made illegal, the voters would be fully represented.[/private_Chevron]

The police weren’t grossly over violent. You may erroneously believe that police are more violent due to increasing tension in society but in fact, the police are in a large measure the reason why tension is increasing.  Police are overly aggressive towards people because they are tasked with protecting the law and they view the citizens as the enemy – it does NOT have to be this way.  [private_Chevron]In a wonderful world where public justice is based on protecting human rights/security/safety instead of on preserving a government’s power to be tyrannical, the police and people would both be on the same side.[/private_Chevron]

Greedy corporations weren’t flushing our environment into the sewer and our planetary resources into the landfill sites.  Greed merchants and warmongers are party sponsors and as such, they enjoy the primary service from elected officials.  They also own the mass media, so you’re never told of the real picture.  [private_Chevron]In a wonderful world where the public administration represents people first, both the ecological and the economic problems would simply vanish – unless we leave retaking control of our own lives and our wonderful world until it is too late.[/private_Chevron]

Imagine this wonderful new world. Visualize it as clearly as you can and discuss some wonderful world concepts with me and with with people you know.  When enough of us can see the better future in our mind’s eye, then it will come to fabulous fruition.

I’m Getting REALLY Frustrated with your STUPIDITY!

99.99 percent of people are; self-centered and stupid, blind and stupid, greedy and stupid, apathetic and stupid or just plain stupid and stupid.  By brain to body mass ratio, the dinosaurs had the equivalent of a walnut rattling around in a human skull: that makes a prehistoric dinosaurs seem as a genius compared to most people living today.  Hitting the Earth with a species killing asteroid, like what killed the giant reptiles, is about the kindest thing that God could do.  Otherwise, humanity is seemingly doomed to a slow death of being killed off by stupidity.

Do you have even the slightest clue of what I’m talking about?

Almost all of the worst problems our society faces are EASILY solvable!   Shall I name a few?  How about Terrorism, mass-murder, most crime, drug epidemic, war, police/gang violence and global warming.  All of these and far more are caused by the same simple thing!  And it could be easily and painlessly fixed.  But you are to stupid, self-centered, greedy, and/or apathetic to even try to understand the NEW theory.

Try reading and understanding this: Simple Solution for Society

[private_Chevron]I feel like I’m Paul Atredies in Frank Herbert’s Dune trilogy. I’ve been into the place where the rest are afraid to look, and it is a wonderful place. Society has taught people to automatically shun and fear the word ‘anarchy‘, before actually thinking rationally about it. The form of ‘anarchy’ that exists in Somalia is not good but a phrase that can be associated with ‘anarchy’ is ‘freedom from rule’. I don’t advocate ‘lawlessness’ as in freedom to commit crimes. Instead, I promote using a judicial/police system that is not rooted on our having to be ‘ruled’, in order to have security and justice. And that concept would SOLVE our problems.[/private_Chevron]

A Golden Free Future Awaits – After You Wake Up!

People have called me everything from an anarchist to the anti-Christ.  I don’t care if my position is not understood yet, I’ll continue to state it as loudly and clearly as I’m able to.  I have every right to hold the opinions that I strongly do.

The Authority has NO Authority to be the Authority!

[private_Chevron]I personally do NOT recognize the Government of Canada’s legitimacy as the government of Canada. You might suppose you are free and living in a Democracy, but I state emphatically that you are NEITHER.  The law treats you as if you are owned as a serf and a party dictatorship is NOT democratic.  The ‘Rule-of-Law’ has NO logical right to rule and law is also a very BAD ruler.  Law is guilty of abetting most crime and actually causing some crime.  Changing to a human-rights based system of justice would immediately reduce crime by the amount that law encourages crime – that is probably a 25-50% instant decrease.

Try to think beyond your social programming in favor of law, to see it in its actual fact.  You are enslaved to law.  Law deems itself to have the right to tell you what to do, and to punish you as its slave when you are disobedient.  But examine where the rule-of-law derives the ‘right’ to treat you as a serf – it doesn’t have it – period.  If each citizen as individuals do not posses the ‘right’ to enact laws for others, then the government does NOT have the ‘right’ either, because zero times however many millions, still equals zero.

A human rights based justice system could operate as effectively as law does but without all the many MANY problems inherent and unavoidable with the utterly F*CKED and incorrect theory of law.  And by being based on actual human rights, an alternate justice system WOULD ACTUALLY have the right to operate, as law most certainly does NOT.  But this different criminal justice system would require your waking up and thinking clearly.

No, a Party Dictatorship is NOT a Democratic System

A party system of supposed Democracy only does one thing.  It enables a tiny minority to fabricate a false claim of its commanding a majority.  The sideline problem with a party system of government is that it facilitates and actually encourages political corruption.  The American founding founders were dead set against the party system but had to adopt it when some unscrupulous people banded together into a party. And the rest is a long history of abuse and corruption.  Big money interests don’t need to bribe 50% of a legislature, as they would in a Democracy.  With a party system, only the party leaders need to receive pay-offs.

Do you feel represented by your elected representative?  You shouldn’t because if your elected rep is a member of a political party, then he or she isn’t able to speak their own mind – much less yours.  The party member is basically a sock-puppet for the party leader.  Nazi Party, Fascist Party, Communist Party, Republican Party and Concervative Party.  What is the common theme here?  A party system is no party for real people.  So why don’t we wake up, call the horseshit for what it is, and move on to a bright future of real democracy?

Have I offended you?  Maybe you should comprehend before you decry.

I know that people become incensed when I say that law and the current government are horseshit.  But were you to actually understand my alternate vision, you would see that it DOES make good logical sense and that it points the way to a much better future than the polluted, global-warmed police state where we are currently on a collision course with.  I know that we need police, courts and public administrations what we DON’T need is laws, governments and unrestricted power in the hands of corrupt warmongers.

More and more people are coming to see politics and law as I do.  When enough do understand, then the government and the rule-of-law WILL fall (and good riddance).  Don’t you suppose its a good idea to explore the other available options – before it’s too late?

[/private_Chevron]

Referencing this news story – Torture Memo Trips Up Tories

Frankly, why is Canada involved in the Afghanistan crimes at all? It makes me ashamed to be a Canadian. George Bush, the stupidest and most warmongering of all US presidents, illegally invaded a nation and needed his troops freed up to illegally invade another country. So Canada and other NATO member countries were pressured into taking over there.

[private_Chevron]Think rationally about this for a second. Isn’t a government that tortures just as as bad as the Taliban they replaced? And seemingly, the criminal Canadian government is fully aware of the human rights abuses in Afghanistan, by the criminal government that NATO forces installed and are propping up. Canada is by cooperation, participating in perpetrating atrocity![/private_Chevron]

Control your OWN Financial Future!

[private_Chevron]When are people going to wake up? This news story is the blandly written crap that we’ve come to expect from the mainstream media, but the true facts are still in there. Canada mouths off about the ‘human rights repression’ of a nation like China, but meanwhile the Canadian and other Western governments have been steadily curtailing human rights ever since 911 and the torture chambers in Afghanistan (and Gitmo) are just the visible tip of the heinous iceberg.[/private_Chevron]

I just thought of something that I should insert here.  As a general rule of thumb, whoever the Americans pick to rule a nation is invariably the wrong one to back.  American administrations have about a 100% BAD decision history of installed puppet governments.  These include; the Shah of Iran and his torturous SAVAK, Saddam Hussain, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.  And the list goes on and on from there.

[private_Chevron]Should we not start questioning? And hold criminals like Steven Harper to justice? Before we all find ourselves living in George Orwell’s 1984. The criminal government of Canada does NOT have legitimate authority to sponsor torture and human rights abuses in Afghanistan. If the real truth were to be told, the Canadian ‘authority’ has no actual authority to be the authority here either.[/private_Chevron]

Use Conversational Hypnosis to gain control of your OWN mind