Russell Twyce

Which Do You REALLY Want: Eternal Life or Eternal Youth?

The terms eternal life and eternal youth seem to mean the same but they are not.  Eternal life means being deathless and ironically, that does occur on death.  So the only way to gain eternal life is to die, which is counterproductive if you’re just looking for longevity.  Yes, that statement sounded humorous, but I meant it quite literally and truthfully.

Eternal youth, on the other hand, is attainable in life.  [private_Chevron]Eternal youth can be obtained with a philosopher stone.  But a philosopher stone doesn’t necessarily bring eternal life.  A person with eternal youth could still be killed.  And then on death, he or she would gain eternal life – as a soul.  So what am I really saying here about eternal life and eternal youth?  (I’m not just prattling on and using the terms philosopher stone, eternal youth and eternal life to get a better search engine position for those keywords, but that is a side-benefit.)  I’m asking whether you REALLY want eternal life or eternal youth – and the true answer might surprise you.

The physical and quantum theory of precisely how a philosopher stone can be effective at granting eternal youth is not all that difficult.  A person just needs to open their minds to a few new definitions of reality.  And over the longer term of human existence, a physical philosopher stone may not even be a necessary component in maintaining eternal youth.  The more complex part of the eternal youth process is the ‘philosopher’ portion of the stone.  A person seeking to gain eternal youth MUST actually WANT eternal youth, and that is NOT as automatic, or as ‘given’ as it might seem.  Almost everyone living today would choose eternal life (complete with death), over having eternal youth and an essentially deathless state.[/private_Chevron]

“I would NOT choose death and eternal life by that way: I WANT eternal youth!”

Did that statement mirror your reaction to the above paragraph?  I would suggest that you don’t know yourself as well as you might think that you do.  Look at life around you: people hate living.  [private_Chevron]They feel they are slaves to the government (which they are) and they detest having to toil at so many mindless pursuits to earn the pieces of paper that are exchanged for some luxuries (but mostly essentials).  Even the rich are not actually happy so they try to drown their disillusionment in gambling, drugs, sex, drinking, pampering or just more money lust.  People are living in a death wish, right from the high echelons of power and on down.  Suicides are just those who feel it stronger than others.[/private_Chevron]

Your death wish ages and ultimately kills you.  Yes, animals age and die too but other creatures don’t have [private_Chevron]the mental or ‘philosophical’ faculties that can extend life and youth to the infinite as people do.  The advances in medicine and health over the past several centuries should have at least quadrupled the average life span, but intolerable societal conditions on earth (like crime, greed, war, pollution and stress) have cut that by half or more.  The physical philosopher stone is therefore needed to counteract the death wish – but then the ‘philosopher’ component of a philosopher’s stone won’t work until you actually understand why you have the death wish.[/private_Chevron]

“I don’t have a death wish! And I would like eternal life!”

(Almost) everyone shares the death wish and you’re lying to yourself about not having it – and you KNOW it.  Have you ever entertained a suicide notion?  Even a passing one?  Do you smoke?  Do you gamble or engage in other self-destructive activities like over-eating?  [private_Chevron]That is your death wish surfacing and your lying to yourself about that and other untruths in society is precisely why you have the death wish.  Your immortal spirit believes in truth and you are withholding that.  And to escape all the lies, your soul wants to die – so it can go home to the real truth of the afterlife (quantum space).

A philosopher’s stone and the philosophy that activates the philosopher’s stone will end your death wish by feeding your soul the truth, and you get the eternal youth as the byproduct of a happier life.

I would love to share my discovery of the philosopher stone.  But I won’t offer it to someone who is not capable of effectively using it to the effect of eternal youth, and who would only accuse me of fraud.  If you are interested in experiencing eternal youth through a philosopher’s stone, and if you are willing to let your mind explore some new avenues, then contact me by commenting on this post.[/private_Chevron]

A Government Pension at Twenty Five

Short Fiction by Russell Twyce

“According to this file,” a government bureaucrat set a reverent palm flat on the open folder, “you’ve been collecting old-age security checks for the past five years.  Yet you are obviously a man in your early 20’s.”

“Chronologically,” the young man dug out his wallet, “and by my government issued identification cards, I have just passed my 70th birthday.”  He offered up the proof.

Then this has to be either forged or in error.”  The government agent stated after he had intensely scrutinized the document.  “What year were you born in?”

“I was born in 1940 and I aged normally until 1985, when I discovered the secret of eternal youth.  From then to now, I’ve been growing younger, instead of older.”

“My year of birth was 1955.”  The civil servant announced in a mocking tone.  With grey hair and many facial wrinkles, his physical appearance exactly matched his 55 years of age. “And you are NOT fifteen years older than I am.  So let’s get to the real truth of this situation.”

“The honest truth is exactly as I’ve said.  You can look into my tax records or you can have the police fingerprint me and compare the result against any government files you can drag up.  I was born in 1940 and I am currently seventy years of age.”

“You didn’t invent the secret of immortality.”  The pension official scoffed.  “I should think that such a discovery, if proven, would’ve made an international news splash.  I don’t recall hearing anything about it in 1985 or since.”

“I didn’t seek any publicity and I didn’t care if anyone verified my results or not.”
“Right.”  The disbelieving government man said in a sarcastic voice.  “So you actually are seventy and you fully expect me NOT to cancel your old age security benefits?”

Conversational Hypnosis Opens Many Doors – Click Here

“Correct.”

“And I suppose your cute wife over there,” with a nod he indicated a young woman in the waiting area, “is fast approaching sixty-five?”

“My girlfriend there is twenty-two.  My wife passed away awhile before I uncovered the secret of Nicholas Flamel’s philosopher stone.”

“Does she know that you’re seventy?”

“Absolutely.”  The young looking old man smiled.  “She appreciates my maturity and experience, while still being able to enjoy the physicality and vitality of my second twenties.”

“Philosopher’s Stone and Nicholas Flamel?”  The scoffing of a minute ago had been replaced with a pang of envy: whether the old-age pension claimant was 25 or 70, that girl was certainly a knockout.  “You’ve obviously been to a Harry Potter movie.”

“JK Rowling didn’t invent either the name of Nicholas Flamel or the philosopher’s stone idea.  Nicholas was an alchemist born in 1330 and he returned to his youth after learning of the philosopher’s stone from an ancient manuscript.”

“And I suppose you know this for a fact.”

Definitely.  Nicholas Flamel is a friend of mine.  He contacted me after he deduced that someone else had achieved his eternal youth secret.  Nick is a cool old guy, who looks like he is twenty.  He thought it was hilarious that he was immortalized, off camera, in the movies.  But the author has no clue that Flamel really is still alive.”

“I suppose he collects an old-age pension too?”  The bureaucrat jotted down the name: he would look it up in his files later.

“No.  Nicholas is an alchemist.  Whenever he needs money, he turns lead into gold.”

“Since you have his eternal youth secret, why doesn’t he give you the transmutation tips too?  Then you wouldn’t need to keep your pension.”

“Nicholas has his thing and I have mine.  When he was born, there wasn’t a public pension plan in place, so he needs to make gold.  I paid years worth of exorbitant taxes to earn my retirement income, so I’ll use it for my ‘golden years’ and I’ll keep collecting it for a VERY long time.”

“Unless I stamp your file as a fraud and cancel it.”

Click Here to Build an Enduring Income

“On what grounds?”  The young man asked in a resolute voice.  “The proof of my age and even the ‘before’ and ‘after’ pictures are iron-clad in your department of motor vehicles.  The stored license photos will show me growing older until 1985 and then progressively younger until my most recent one.”

“On grounds that I work for the Federal Government and can therefore do whatever I want to you and your case!”

“With impunity.”  The young man added through pursed lips.  He bit his tongue from saying what was really on his mind.  ‘And that mentality is precisely why I haven’t shared the gift of eternal youth with everyone.’  “But that political superiority will not live on forever.”

“Your life won’t be much longer than mine.”  The agent misconstrued the comment as personal instead of global.  “How long do you have before a return to infancy?”

“Your facts all seem to come from fiction.”  It was now the younger man’s turn for the mocking tone.  “I’m not living a backwards life, as the ‘Curious Case of Benjamin Button’.  I’ve rejuvenated as far as I want to, so I’ll stop using my philosopher stone.  I’ll age normally until I choose to start growing younger again.”

“And then what?”

“I’ll make another philosopher stone.”

[private_Chevron]“What does an eternal youth granting philosopher stone look like?”  The middle-aged man excitedly inquired.  He was suddenly buying into the young man’s story – and he imagined himself as becoming the same.

“Exactly like this.”  The man with seeming eternal youth pulled a white stone from his pocket.  It was of a pyramid shape with rounded points.

“I suppose you’ll want to be eighteen again.”  The government guy’s eyes flicked askance to the ageless man’s 22-year-old sweetheart: if available to him, the 55-year-old with lecherous tendencies would want even younger girls.

“Nah.  I’m happy now and my looking even younger would present more problems.  I went to a bar recently and was asked to show proof of age.  The bouncer noticed the disparity between my eternally youthful looks and my official age.  It turned nastier when the doorman called over the police who were patrolling.  They wanted to charge me with using false ID but their computers confirmed who I was.”

Click Here to find out What He Knows – That You Don’t

“That incident landed you on my scope.  The cops were not pleased with the outcome, so they furthered the information up the line.  And as a fraud investigator, your case landed on my desk.” Then the government official stressed a sentence.  “Where on my whim, I can approve or deny the status of your old-age pension.”

“I see that.”  The young pensioner said flatly.

“But I am interested in learning more about your philosopher stone.”  The agent lightened the atmosphere with a perky voice.  “How does it work?  Do you use it continually?  Is it fully automatic?”

“When I sleep, I have it nestled somewhere against my body.  During the day, I put it in my pocket but I cut a small hole inside the material.  The stone functions when it is touching skin.   And there is a mental component too.”

“Mental?”

“You have to spiritually bond with the philosopher’s stone.  It is called a philosopher stone and not an eternal youth stone because the real trick is in knowing that the stone will bring eternal youth.  Then the stone activates a gate into the quantum universe: more precisely, the stone is that quantum gate.”

“How do you spiritually bond with a philosopher stone?”

“That is as easy as feeling that it is there.”  The young man explained.  “I reach into the stone with my imagination – for lack of a better word.”

“This is a product of your imagination.”  Said the investigator in a disillusioned way.

“Quantum space is all about possibility and that is formulated in an imagination.  Then with a gate open, quantum space manifests the mind’s possibility into reality.  I am youthful beyond my seventy years, and that is my fantasy’s possibility transformed into my physical reality – and your reality too.  Because to your eyes, I am twenty-five years old, when all your files show I’m nearly three times that.”

“The commercial prospects of a bona-fide age reversing product would be huge!”

“I have personal reasons for not wanting to do that.”  The young man’s statement and the abrupt delivery left no invitation for further discussion.

“Then let’s get back to your pension case.”  The middle-aged bureaucrat said aloud.  But his mind was exploring what the personal reasons might be.  Perhaps with some sleuthing might uncover a past tidbit that could be used to exert leverage.  Having a cut on the sale of eternal youth could be worth a vast sum of wealth.  All he had now was a cloudy issue of the rather small federal pension – but he could milk it for what he might get from it.  “Why should we continue to pay a pension, when you are so obviously capable of being a productive contributor to the national product?”

“I worked my allotted years and a percentage of my earnings went to pay pensions for those who retired before me.  Why should I be required to continue slaving in the anthill, just because physically, the years have been extraordinarily kind to me?”

“Why indeed?”  The sly functionary softened his tone in preparation for the ‘hook’.  “The federal pension is a universal benefit and revoking it in one instance might be politically sensitive.  It would also likely mean public disclosure of your philosopher stone and seemingly, we both need to weigh the desirability of that eventuality.”

“What are you proposing?”  The stone’s owner was not as naive as his youthful look suggested.

“If you give me your philosopher’s stone for my evaluation of it,” again, the slippery government agent glanced lasciviously at the girl in the waiting area, and he subconsciously licked his lips in prurient anticipation, “I’ll deep six this file until I’ve seen the stone in action.  Then after I’ve consulted with my superiors, we can discuss the matter further.”

“I’m done with it now anyways.”  The young man pushed the pyramid shaped item across the desktop.

“You may as well use it.  I’ll make another in ten years or so.”

With exaggerated theatrics, the ecstatic bureaucrat stamped the papers with ‘No Further Action’.  And the deal was done with a final handshake.  The aging agent’s pulse thundered, as his mind’s eye conjured up a bevy of nubile beauties frolicking nakedly in a lavish suite littered with piles of cash.  He barely noticed the young looking man rejoin his girlfriend and leaving the building.

“I saw you give him the stone,” the gorgeous young woman said after her boyfriend had told her what happened, “and I observed that dirty old man’s creepy looks.  Your giving him a philosopher stone doesn’t seem to match your character.  And how can you know that you can even trust him over the long term?”

“He’ll be dead by tomorrow.”  The seventy-year-old man in a 25-year-od physique laughed.  “Or geriatric and senile as the average 100-year-old person.  A philosopher stone acts as a battery that stores age and mine has 45 years worth in it.  As soon as the bureaucrat bonds with it, the stone will start unloading – and fast.  Nicholas found that out by accident after a supposed friend stole his first stone.”

“You didn’t offer that information.”  The girl giggled.

“And he didn’t ask about any possible complications either.  Now I’ll be back to flying underneath the radar and you’re correct about my moral fiber.”  As they walked he gave her waist a squeeze.  “I wouldn’t turn someone like that loose on an eternal future.  Graft-taking government agents like that, their power-hungry political employers, and their greedy corporate sponsors are why I won’t put my philosopher stone onto the general market.”

“Maybe in twenty years,” she returned his hug, “when I’m ready to use a philosopher stone, the world will be ready for everyone to share in the gift of eternal youth.”

“Is it really a gift,” he asked in a wry voice, “or is eternal youth a curse?  Flamel has been waiting 700 years in the hope of seeing a society that is worth enduring.”[/private_Chevron]

Click Here – Put a Hypnotic Spark into your Conversations

Do you want to Regain Youth & Return to Early Summer?

YES! Then Read On…

[private_Chevron]I written a previous post about my having re-discovered Nicholas Flamel’s Philosopher’s Stone.  I made a prototype and started using it a couple of weeks ago.  The effects are not visible externally yet but inside where it starts, I’m feeling AWESOME!

I know this sounds crazy or as wishful thinking but I am certain that I stumbled onto the same secret of eternal youth that Nicholas Flamel found.  I’m neither a genius nor an alchemist.  I’m just extremely adept at abstract thinking and at pulling available clues together to form a previously undiscovered pattern.  And I have the unique background of having had a death experience: which confirmed for me the fact that almost ANY possibility truly is possible.

Since it’s far too early to show visual proof of eternal youth, with before & after pictures, I’ll offer up some of the clues that lead me to the philosopher stone.  (In no particular order);

1.  Death Experience – Firstly, my death experience showed me that my eternal soul is deathless: that was obvious just from my being away from my deceased corpse.  The second clue in the NDE was much more subtle and I’m unable to describe precisely how it came to me, but I had the distinct impression that I would be returning to a body that could be made deathless as well.

2.  Quantum Physics & The Secret – I watched the movie ‘What the Bleep!? – Down the Rabbit Hole‘, (you may want to as well) about the new science of quantum physics.  And around then, I also learned of ‘The Secret‘ and the ‘Law of Attraction‘.  But my interest was not in how to ‘attract’ money, love or success: rather, quantum physics sparked my curiosity for the potential of it being able to do MUCH more.  I see ‘The Secret‘ and the ‘Law of Attraction‘ as just the tip of the iceberg of benefits that quantum physics holds for humans!

– I’ll finish this article later.  I got consumed with writing this short story instead.  I love writing fiction and it takes a higher priority with me.  Click Here to read it – A Government Pension at Twenty-Five.  (It’s on this same philosopher stone, regain youth and keep eternal youth topic: writing this post inspired me to fictionalize).

Continuing again….

3. We get new bodies every year – The body you have is NOT the same one that you had last year.  Over the space of months, each cell in your physical body has undergone regeneration and replacement.  So why do we age at all?  When our cells are continuously kept fairly new?  Medical science does not have a definitive answer.  Doubtlessly quantum physics is involved in a manner that we’re not aware of.

4. ‘Philosopher Stone is hard as rock and soft as butter’ – I wish I had kept better notes of my research because I recall this description, probably note exactly as I quoted, and now I can’t find it again.  This line and several other quips on the appearance and properties of the stone gave me an idea of which material Flamel might have been using.

5. PHILOSOPHER stone – The item for gaining eternal youth is NOT named ‘youth’ stone, or even ‘life’ stone.  It’s called ‘philosopher’ stone and the word philosopher suggests that thought is involved.  IE, I suppose that a person could hold an exact replica of Flamel’s stone, or even the original one, and it would be utterly inert unless the correct mental key was applied.

6. ORMUS material – A Google search of the term ‘philosopher stone’ returns a number of links to pages describing ORMUS material.  (I won’t try to summarize what you can look up for yourself.)  This material though seems to be simultaneously active in both quantum space and the physical universe.  That property would make it ideal for the construction of a philosopher stone.

Those are some of the main clues.  And as I’ve said earlier, I believe that I have already found the secret of the philosopher stone.  But I can’t offer any proof yet (nor perhaps will I once I can).

While writing this post, I was suddenly struck with a short story idea.  So I took a break and wrote it.  I’ve intentionally left the note I inserted in place because it does fit this article and I suggest that you read the story.  The final ‘clue’ I’ll present is…

7. My Fiction Writing – I strongly believe that when we are engaged in creating something, we are closest to god (or to quantum space if you cringe at the word ‘god’).  I may never be a famous author but I really don’t care because my fiction stories are my link to the divine.  I find inspirations for my real life, within the words of my prose, often from snippets that don’t appear to apply to my current situation.

To wrap up this post.  The philosopher stone exists! At least the possibility for eternal youth from a philosopher stone is real.  Either I have the key to eternal physical life now, or somewhere in the future another person will have it.  One other thing is also painfully certain.  YOU will never gain the eternal youth granted by a philosopher’s stone unless you accept that a philosopher’s stone can actually exist.  The key to manifesting reality, is in comprehending that what you manifest is real.

Try Boning Up on the Secret Theory

PS.  I’d be much more apt to share the philosopher stone with people who actually try to support my efforts, by clicking on my ad links or buying and reading my work.  I recall a nursery rhyme about all the farm animals that wanted to share in the meal, when they had refused to assist in the preparation.[/private_Chevron]

Metaphysical Youth

You may have read Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, or perhaps you’ve seen the movie.  But did you know that neither Nicholas Flamel nor the philosopher stone were products of JK Rowling’s imagination?  Nicholas Flamel was real and purportedly, so was his gaining eternal youth though use of philosopher stone.  Did Nicholas Flamel gain eternal youth and eternal life by using the metaphysical Philosopher’s Stone?

[private_Chevron]My belief is that though Nicholas Flamel may well have gotten eternal youth, he would not necessarily have eternal life.  His eternal youth could have been easily cut short with a sword and during the 1400′s, with the hundred years war still going strong, And even into the 15 and 1600′s France was not a place conducive to eternal life, or even an especially  long life.

However, the intent of this post is NOT to prove, disprove or even to discuss whether Nicholas Flamel is actually alive now.  I’m really just interested in talking about the philosopher’s stone.[/private_Chevron]

Are you interested in reading the Akashic Records?

[private_Chevron]One element of my 2004 death experience involved my metaphysical impression that eternal life was a reality in eternity but that eternal life and eternal youth were both possible in life too.  I had already heard about the philosopher’s stone and Nicholas Flamel so for the past few years, I’ve devoted some time to learning more, and to theorize on the metaphysical possibilities.  And this effort has finally born fruit.  I’ve already made my own philosopher’s stone and I have begun experimenting with philosopher stone with the objective of achieving eternal youth.  I believe that I’m having some success.

I’m not ready to start selling philosopher stone or offer the prospect of eternal youth and eternal life to anyone yet.  Honestly, I’m not sure on the ethics of metaphysical youth yet and that’s what I’d like to discuss with interested people.  I keep asking myself, ‘why didn’t Nicholas Flamel make his philosopher stone available to anyone else?’  Would I like to see criminals having eternal life?  (By this, I mean criminals like most politicians, corporate CEO’s and lawyers).  Please contact me is you’re interested in learning more or offering your input.[/private_Chevron]

PS.  I’ll keep this blog posted on the results I experience with my philosopher stone experimentation.  (I had another post on this topic but deleted it because my tone wasn’t right.)

Short Fiction – set in the near future by Russell Twyce

A teacher stands before her class of Junior High School students.  The fashions and hairstyles have changed much over the last ninety years, but the arrangement of desks and the faces flushed with life of the children remains as it is today.  The history teacher is holding a paper for a pop quiz.

“Quiet now.”  She holds up a flat hand to call for silence and attention.  “Now who can tell me what the three main era’s of the previous 2000 years were called?”  She chose one from amid the small wheat field of raised hands.  “Jilvian?”

“The first was the dark ages,” a girl answered, “of which not very much was recorded with full accuracy.”

“Correct.  And who will tell us what period came next? Rodagar?”

“Yes mam.”  A blond boy stood up to answer.  “Then came the age of feudalism and serfdom when people were owned by the land and where the land was owned by the nobles.”

“Very good.”  The teacher smiled.  “What was the third?  Jacqeleze?”

“Industrial Age.”  A timid girl answered quickly.  Then she saw the imploring look on her teacher’s face and expanded on her answer.  “It is also known as the second age of feudalism and serfdom.”

“Thank you.”  The teache said.  “Now can someone tell me the difference between the first and second ages of serfdom?  Barklane?”

[private_Chevron]“In the first, the nobles owned the land and the land owned the people.  In the second, the lawyers, police and politicians owned the law and the law owned the people.”

“That’s close, but you missed something important.”

“Nations owned the land and the people?”

“Yes.”  The teacher nodded.  “In order for it to be considered serfdom, human bondage needs to be involved and that was certainly the case when nations were thought of as all-powerful.  Who can remind us of what other overly powerful entities people had to overthrow before they gained real freedom?”

“The corporations that had been given super-human status.”  A boy answered after the teacher nodded at him.  “They had huge revenues and they bought and sold politicians, lawyers and judges.  I think it should be called the black age of corruption and greed.  How were people stupid enough to abide with it?”[/private_Chevron]

“As we covered in the lesson, populations under the two Nazi regimes were repressed mostly by the harsh police action, economic blackmail and a mass media that pumped out propaganda.  Adstell, will you tell us how the two Nazi regimes differed?”

“The German Nazi government was anti-Semitic and the American Nazi government was pro-Semitic.  And while the German Nazis called themselves Nazi, the American Nazi government used the names Democrat and Republican.”

“Fazette, can you elaborate on why the American Nazi government was not named for what it was?”

“The Americans fought the German Nazis during World War Two and so a stigma was attached to the term.  However, the American Nazis were just as racially intolerant of all non-Americans as the German Nazis were.  The American Nazis were also as violently expansionist.  They felt that their strong economic and technical abilities entitled them to crush ‘inferior’ nations, cultures and people.”

“Well done.”  The teacher beamed.  It seemed like her whole class of students were likely to score well on the formal test.  “So for a final question in this quiz, who will describe what finally ended the Nazism and serfdom to give us the wonderful civilization we enjoy today?  I’ll point and you can each offer an answer.”

[private_Chevron]“People started using rockets to colonize the planets, instead of to deliver bombs.”  Shouted James.

“We finally understood that law was only making lawyers rich.  In return for the slavery to it,  law was only really creating even more crime.”  Answered Elsebeth.

“People demanded true democracy and the party dictatorships were abolished.”  Added Seanne.

“National governments were turned into public administrations.”  Intoned Zaig.

“Justice became based on human rights, instead of on a ruler’s supreme power.”  Said Burgret.

“Excellent!”  The teacher applauded.  “Next week we’ll be starting our next module.  That will cover the history of economics.  We start at the gold standard and finish when the criminal greed practices like the commodity futures market and debt based currency were abolished.  Have a great weekend!”[/private_Chevron]

No Possible Validation Short Story by Russell Twyce

“This is something we have to do.”  The police chief spoke into a microphone at a press conference.  “We’re required to maintain order and keep the peace.”  Whether he had anything else to say suddenly became moot as a windowpane shattered from being hit with a bullet.  The slug’s trajectory was essentially unaffected and it struck the police chief in the left temple.  He was dead before he and the podium he was gripping collapsed off the stage.

Another hole was punctuated in the window and a scream followed the shot by an instant: the police officer that had employed the taser weapon on the ten-year-old girl dropped off his chair with a shattered spine.  And bedlam ensued as people dived for cover, in a panic.   But no further shots were fired.

“Over the span of less than five seconds,” a newscaster said in a disgusted voice, “one fine police chief was dead and an officer was consigned to a wheelchair.  They were engaged in doing a brave and often thankless job.  It was a cowardly sniper—”.  He didn’t finish his sentence because a 22-caliber bullet fired from studio rafters broke his teeth and devastated his jaw’s right hinge.

“What a day!”  Jen the station’s young weather-girl commented to herself as she crossed the darkened parking lot.  She might’ve felt a bit nervous after a deadly day but there were some police vehicles idling in the lot, as the forensic team was still busy inside the studio.

“Poor Bob.”  She muttered about the newscaster that would be drinking soup through a wired shut mouth.  But she didn’t feel much sentiment: the guy was a conceited jerk and she wouldn’t miss him.

Jen keyed her car’s door lock and slipped into the driver’s seat.  And from behind, a pungent cloth doused in chloroform was clamped over her face.

“You will not be harmed in any way.”  A male voice said in a calm tone.

Jen had just awakened to find that she was bound and blindfolded.  The restraints did not feel like ropes.  Instead she had been tied with torn strips of a soft sheet.  The weather girl could tell that she was still clothed, so the prospect of an immanent rape didn’t seem likely.

“Who are you?”  Jen mumbled over a tongue that felt dry and cottony from the knockout drug he had employed on her.

“I’m the cowardly sniper.”  He spoke softly and in an ironic voice, while he busied himself with her bonds.  The mysterious gunman freed her hands and then took off the girl’s blindfold.  “I’ve brought you here so that you could interview me.”

“I’m not in the news department.”  Jen protested.  She saw that she was seated at a table, on which there was a steno-pad, pencils and a thankfully, a pitcher of water.  She quickly poured a tumbler full.

“And neither are the administrative staff that would’ve first received a statement sent by post.”  The kidnapper was wearing a mask.  It was not a Halloween type or an improvised thug’s mask.  Rather, he was elegantly attired for a masquerade ball.  “Yet I suspect you took enough journalism courses to conduct a proper interview.”

“Why did you choose me?”

“Because as the weather girl,” he chuckled as he spoke, “you’re the only on-air person at that station that has not lied to me—or the other viewers.  You report the weather as you know it, or as you believe it.  Sometimes you’re wrong, but you don’t deliberately deceive, as all other reporters and anchor persons do.”

“Why did you do it?”  Jen bluntly shot out the first question that came to mind.

“I did what many people wish they could do.”  The masked sniper turned the chair opposite the interviewer and sat with his arms folded on the chair’s back.  “An event like the police using a taser on a child offends the moral fiber of most people.  It shows that the police are NOT protecting us.  They are just brutal thugs tasked with keeping ordinary folk under the corrupt thumb of a criminal government.  The cop that actually used the weapon on the ten-year old girl doesn’t deserve to be walking around armed, and now he will be in a wheelchair.”

“The police chief didn’t do it.”

“He merited much worse for defending the action.  There is no possible validation for a policeman’s using a high-voltage stun gun against a child.  The police chief’s defense of an out-of-control officer’s heinous action was in fact, a commendation for the cop’s action.  He was stating that in traumatizing with brute force, anyone that had the gumption to refuse a policeman’s command – even and especially a child’s, that the officer was performing his real function is subduing any future thoughts of resistance to the authority – with grossly overly heavy-hands.”

“So you dealt him death.”  Jen inquired as she scribbled notes on her pad.  “That seems to be as heavy-handed as the officer’s assault on the girl.”

“I interpreted the chief’s words as a statement of eagerness to the political higher ups.  He was saying that he was ruthless enough to step into a role in the criminal political organization.  So I terminated his political career, instead of just giving him a painful wound for his part in the atrocity.”

“You speak of this ‘criminal government’ but this is a democracy: politicians are elected into office by vote.”

“No they’re not.  A party determines who will be on a ballot.  When is the last time you felt you actually had a choice between anything but ‘bad’ or ‘worse’.  I expect your true answer would be ‘never’, but the fear of police brutality and/or social ostracizing is ingrained as deeply in your psyche, as it is in everyone else’s.”

“And you visualize yourself as the only one that will point at the Emperors clothes?”

“Precisely.”  The masked sniper stood.  “And I’m well armed and equipped for that.”

“So the police in this area should be warned.”

“Not just in this jurisdiction.  I happened to be handy to this event, but I’m willing and able to travel to wherever out-of-control police need to be reprimanded.”

“Who are you?”  The girl paused in her writing to look appraisingly at him.  The seemingly young man appeared to be in exceptional physical shape.

[private_Chevron]“It doesn’t matter who I am.  The only thing that counts is that I’m here and that I plan on loudly speaking the quiet public’s true mind, when it needs to be spoken.”

“I don’t think the news editor will air this material, or that the authorities will let him.”  Jen said.  “If anything, you’ll be branded as a dangerous psychopath.”

“Then attach this quote.”  The sniper replied in a sincere tone.  “I have infinite patience and an amazing ability to penetrate any security.  If my views are not presented, I will express my displeasure in a suitably painful or even fatal way.”

“A threat with power behind it can be as effective as an assassination.”  Jen commented as she transcribed his exact words.

“It’s especially useful against those who have their noses deeply in the gravy train.  They don’t want to risk loosing the excesses that they enjoy.”[/private_Chevron]

The End

The above short story is fiction but it is obviously inspired by the true event that recently happened in the American Ozarks, where a police officer used a taser weapon on a ten-year old girl because she was being ‘unruly’ and refusing to take a shower.  This type of police brutality initially offends us, but then people complacently forget about it.  Yet the police are totally out-of-control and incidents like taser use on a child, or tasering to death an unarmed man in Vancouver Canada, are just the highly visible tip of a huge iceberg of senseless police brutality in propping up criminal governments.

We people need to take a clear look at how our society is ordered, or these type of officially condoned crimes against humanity will get worse and more frequent, as we descend further into a police state.  Crime and terrorism is growing because the law enables it to flourish, while the police concentrate only on oppressing people and raising government revenue with tickets.  By only turning a blind eye, you are committing a crime against the future of humanity.

Is your inhospitable home on Io?

“I wish I had more green to liven up my life.”  Lester Cash yawned and looked out his small habitat’s portal at the bleak tan landscape of Io.  He had removed himself to the most remote place he could find to get a little peace from those wanted to chew pieces from him. So here he was on one of Jupiter’s moons.

When a person is deeply in debt, they may feel that they are living on Io.  Io is one of Jupiter’s four largest moons and living there might even be better than living in the sate of ‘I-owe’ anywhere on Earth.

A person in severe debt might wish for the complete isolation of Io because the bill collector’s calls would suffer a time delay from the vast distance away.

You may live on iO because, in computer terms, your i (income) is smaller than your O (output).  But there are better solutions than moving so far away.

You can blast off from Io: you just need to find money to burn on the ticket. And as with any travel tickets, you have the choice between class.

Economy Class involves reducing your outgo until it is less than your income.

First Class involves increasing your income until it is greater than your outgo. It is just that simple. And there are no other choices, unless it is to run away and hide on Io.

“But from today forward,” the bankrupt recluse on Io said, “I’ll be a pirate! I’ll sail the stellar commerce lanes reaping booty – legally. And I’ll finally be off of Io!”

You can be a Clickbank Pirate and have money to burn.

Click Here for a 1st Class Ticket from Io

WHY?

“Because the murderer is a whack job!”

Yes, he is a whack job but that doesn’t answer why.  Every person, crazy or sane, has a reason for their actions.  There are two distinct reasons ‘why’ but they are obviously connected.  [private_Chevron]The first is that the subconscious mind is self-destructive.  (Proof of this self-destructiveness can be witnessed in smokers, compulsive gamblers, suicide, AND in subliminal advertising that features death).

The second is that the murderer wants to make a political / social statement – ‘I don’t want to live in this world and I don’t want my family to have to live in it either’.[/private_Chevron]  The more heinous his crime, the more brightly his blood graffiti message will shine up in the media – “the rule-of-law SUCKS and that is REALLY why I did it!”

“The rule-of-law SUCKS and that is REALLY why he did it?”

Yes.  Odd as it sounds, the rule-of-law is why he killed [private_Chevron]and the law against murder actually enabled him to side-step his good conscience to kill.  Law is slavery.  People get angry when I say that, but it is the truth and you know it.  Law is based on the slavery principle of ‘obey or be punished‘.  There are a lot of flowery quotes and rationalizations around law to assuage a conscious mind and to make you accept the slavery of law as ‘freedom and protection’, when it is neither.  But your subconscious mind certainly knows that law is slavery and that is one big reason why the subconscious mind is self-destructive.

The murderer strikes at the law that he hates with every fiber of his being: he does not see his beloved family standing behind the law.  Then like a bullfighter’s red cape, the law moves away unhurt, and the death blows fall on the victims.  The law did NOT protect the mass-murder’s family: the law made crime targets of them.[/private_Chevron]  The rule-of-law was the co-murderer!

The IS another way!

[private_Chevron]A law operates like this: Killing a person is an act against the state. Killing a person is breaking an edict that belongs to the state. Killing a person is directly disobeying the government. And killers will be PUNISHED, not punished for killing the person but for disobeying the government’s law. Using any of these definitions, a persons level of animosity towards the state or government has to factor into his decision to commit the act.

Non-law operates like this: Killing a person deprives them of their human right to life. Others in society are threatened by a killer who has demonstrated a murderous nature. The justice system WILL take necessary actions to protect people by jailing or other.

Non-law keeps statutes, police, courts and jails fully operational but it eliminates the cancerous parts of law, like slavery and the illogical view that the state is harmed by a crime.[/private_Chevron]

Do you remember Reaganomics?

Or I suppose for the younger audience, I should say, ‘do you remember learning about Reaganomics?’  An unusual theory was presented and then proved – ‘Government revenue could be INCREASED, by LOWERING the tax’.  It seemed strange to many people but it worked.  Now think about the guy who first thought of the idea.  Imagine how he must have had to bash his head against many walls before a few saw what he was talking about.  That is where I am now.

I know how to end terrorism, how to eliminate the spectacular and seemingly pointless mass killings like Columbine, Virginia Tech & Fort Hood, and simultaneously reduce the actual crime rate across the whole spectrum of everyday robberies, rapes, & murders.   And the solution is both simple and painless!  [private_Chevron]In fact, the cure would benefit society in countless ways, it would even solve things like ‘schoolyard bullying’.  It is as easy as Reaganomics was: it just takes a slightly different way of looking at how/why we manage our society.  Courts, police & jails would still operate but even better than they do now.[/private_Chevron]  This might sound Utopian, but like Reaganomics was, it is just logical.

[private_Chevron]The terrorist’s real intended target is the government.  The mass-murder’s real intended target is society as a whole.  Both the terrorist and the mass-murderer are able to strike their targets by hitting ordinary people BECAUSE the law is the direct linkage between government/society and the everyday people.  The mechanism of law, is that the government theoretically takes each crime onto itself.  According to courts, a murderer is really on trial for breaking, or acting against, the government’s law prohibiting murder.

By simply changing the enabling theory of why courts / police / jails are authorized to operate, we could erase the path that links the government to the people.  The government continues to exist and do what it does now (although some terms like ‘governance’ would have to be slightly redefined to fit a new reality.)  But the population target that is currently under the terrorist’s and the mass-murder’s cross-hairs would be effectively removed from the scope’s view.

Law = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Aims gun at a law] –> [Bullet hits people] –> [Political and /or Anti-Social Agenda IS Satisfied]

Non-Law Justice = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Nothing Here to shoot at] –> [Nobody Dies] –> [Political/Society Agenda IS NOT Satisfied]

Or

Non-Law Justice = [Individual or group mad at a government or society] –> [Shoots Person or Persons] –> [We try and jail for killing a person or persons and depriving them of their right to life] –> [No Political/Societal Satisfaction]

When a Politically or Socially motivated killer is unable to satisfy political or social agenda by killing people, then he or she will probably NOT kill at all – and terrorism is eradicated with just the stroke of a pen!

I think it is long passed time that we people evaluated at our political reality anyways.  ‘Law’ evolved from the untrue notion that a noble had the right to inflict his word onto the serfs that he owned.  The post magna charta ‘law’ suggests that the law-giver is a concept that is owned by the people, but it still equates to a noble (albiet an elected one) inflicting his word onto the serfs of a different definition.  It need not be this way.  Justice could be rooted on society’s duty to protect human rights, instead of on a noble’s, or a conceptual state entity’s authority – and justice really SHOULD be rooted on human rights.

Almost every existing law statute could be amended to read and function as a non-law.  (And the few that can’t be amended really shouldn’t be used anyways because they obviously DON’T protect human rights).  All of the law apparatus could be easily retooled to non-law with a simple base theory amendment.  And this could be done with absolutely NO DISRUPTION to protective service.[/private_Chevron]

Like Reaganomics, when this revolutionary theory of public justice takes root and is really looked at and understood, it will prove out to be the right solution for the times.

This post is in reply to ‘Catch Me if you Can‘ – Item 1.  “…Rape a 13 Year Old Girl”.

First off, do you completely understand what I think is the crux problem with law?   [private_Chevron]Instead of dealing with the action, as a verb, that one person did to another, law creates an conceptual item that belongs to the government and the court deals ONLY with that.  IE.  The court is NOT trying to decide if the thirteen year old girl was hurt by the defendant’s actions, the judge is ruling on whether the law itself was affected by his actions.  A court of truth (instead of a court of law) COULD deal with the issue without using an illogical presumption that a law existed in the the bed with them and that the law itself was harmed worse than the girl was.[/private_Chevron]

“Was the only thing stopping you the fact that you didn’t want to go to jail?”

The primary ‘deterrent’ to why people refrain from crime is NOT the threatened punishment. [private_Chevron]Generally, people don’t commit rapes, robberies, murders, and assaults because they empathize with the potential victim and their good conscience would strenuously object.  The secondary ‘deterrence‘ of punishment only enters into the equation as a ‘risk factor’ after the criminal has figured out how they will get around their conscience.[/private_Chevron]

How does the criminal side-step his/her conscience to commit the crime?

Psychologists have said that psychopaths / sociopaths have no consciences, but that is absolute bullshit, everyone has a conscience.  [private_Chevron]The psychopath /sociopath simply understands law differently (better?) than you do.  He or she simply assigns the harm they are doing to the conceptual object of the law, instead of on the living person that the crime is harming.  IE: “I’m not violating this 13 year old girl, I’m only breaking one of society’s laws as a subtle political statement, and the law does not feel it because it does not really exist at all – plus I get sex with a 13 year old girl as an added bonus.”  Essentially, a 13 year old girl is raped because the law against rape provides an easy route around the primary crime-fighting human conscience – that is unacceptable and downright wrong.  The rule-of-law is a crime against humanity that facilitates and actually encourages many smaller crimes against humanity.  And the rule-of-law is unnecessary.[/private_Chevron]

Consider the Roman Polanski case in particular now.

Polanski ‘broke a law’ in the US and then escaped to a non-extradition country – where he conceivably posed a threat to young French girls – but the French Justice system could not act because the law was not broken there.[private_Chevron]  But in actual fact, a law does NOT exist at all, so why should we hamstring our public protection by presuming that a law does exist?

A social justice system that is based on protecting human rights, as opposed to law’s only preserving a government’s power to tell people what to do, would have handled the Roman Polanski case differently.  Yes, the 13 year old girl was an American who was raped while in the US – BUT – the whole case is not dependent on upholding American law: it is about protecting other girls from being raped by a known rapist – wherever they are exposed to the rapist.  Had the defendant remained in the US, then American social justice would have handled it, but as he ran to France, the particulars would have been sent to France for the social justice and protection system to action it there.

People wrongly believe that law is intended to protect them and the intense propaganda surrounding law incorrectly says that law is the ONLY way.   In truth, law exists primarily to keep people subservient to a government and the much better way to protect people is with a social justice apparatus that derives its authority to act from the specific reason of protecting human rights – IE the undeniable right not to be the victim of a crime – especially if that crime is preventable.[/private_Chevron]

I say this following line with utter conviction. 

“The END of terrorism, the END of random victim crimes (like Fort Hood, Virginia Tech and MANY others), and the global reduction in the incidents of crimes against people, WILL be found in a very simple reevaluation of how we view social justice.”